CommandsPremiumDocs
Login

The next generation of Discord community management - maximising engagement in the quickest and most transparent way.

Go Back

Discortics vs Security Bot: Better Integrated Anti-Nuke Management

4 min read
Discortics Team
Discortics Team
Discortics vs Securitybot.gg — Comparison / Securitybot.gg

Anti-Nuke can stop a compromised admin and rebuild some deleted resources. It can't bring back deleted messages, and recreated channels get new IDs. Worth knowing before you need it.

Discortics combines that protection with the rest of your server tools. This comparison looks at its controls alongside Security Bot's, including what recovery actually covers.

TL;DR

  • No bot rewinds your server: recovery recreates supported objects with new IDs; messages and role memberships stay gone.
  • Both cover the basics: configurable anti-nuke thresholds and a whole-server attack mode (Beast Mode vs panic mode).
  • Hierarchy decides everything: Anti-Nuke can't stop accounts whose role sits above the bot's.
  • One less bot to trust: protection and community tools share one bot and one dashboard.

The controls side by side

AreaSecurity BotDiscortics
Destructive actionsConfigurable anti-nuke thresholds and responsesPer-action and mixed-action limits with configured punishments
Coordinated attacksBeast Mode monitors server-wide activityConfigurable panic mode for coordinated attacks
Raids and spamDedicated anti-raid and anti-spam featuresAutopilot anti-raid, anti-spam, and related filters
RecoveryAutomatic server recovery advertised with PremiumBest-effort recovery of supported objects; see the recovery limits
Day-to-day community workSecurity-focused offeringApplications, tickets, giveaways, levels, and economy alongside protection

Sources: Security Bot's official overview and Premium page, checked November 12, 2026. Discortics behavior and limitations are documented in the Anti-Nuke guide.

Both bots let you set thresholds and responses for destructive actions. Both have a mode for when the whole server is under attack at once: Security Bot calls it Beast Mode, we call it panic mode. The real differences are in the details below.

Know exactly what recovery covers

Discortics Anti-Nuke can recreate supported channels, roles and other objects after they're deleted. Recreated objects get new IDs. Deleted messages and role memberships are not restored by that process. That's the checklist. Hold Security Bot's recovery docs against the same list before assuming the two cover the same ground, and don't read protection speed into the fact that both products say "Anti-Nuke."

Role position matters here. A bot can't punish an account above it, so check where your staff roles sit before relying on Anti-Nuke.

Make the rules readable for your mods

Anti-Nuke works best when your staff can tell what it's doing. Discortics keeps a few things deliberately separate:

  • Whitelists exempt trusted people from limits.
  • Allowed bot additions let a bot join. That does not mean everything the bot does later is exempt.
  • Setup access decides who can change the protection in the first place.

Day-to-day trouble lives elsewhere. A spam wave belongs to Autopilot. A failed captcha belongs to Verification. A burst of channel deletions belongs to Anti-Nuke. Different problems, different responses, different logs, so nobody on your team confuses a raid with a rogue admin.

One less bot holding Administrator

Security Bot is focused on security. That's fine if you're happy running separate bots for applications, tickets, giveaways and levels. Every extra bot with high permissions, though, is one more account that could be compromised.

Discortics puts protection and community tools in one bot and dashboard, so there are fewer separate setups for staff to manage.

Do the boring part now

Open the Anti-Nuke setup guide, drag the bot's role high enough, set thresholds that match how your staff actually works, and only then turn on enforcement. Pair it with Autopilot for raids and spam. You'll still hope it never fires. You'll just know what happens if it does.

This comparison covers documented controls; it is not a live attack benchmark or a guarantee that either bot prevents every incident.